February 18, 2018

10 of the Most Sexist Ads From the Past

The advertising world is a truly fascinating instance of subtle or even overt psychological manipulation. Its basic formula — (1) Create a feeling of need or inadequacy (2) Offer a product to fill the void (3) ??? (4) Profit!!! –- is one that is intrinsically demeaning. It is therefore unsurprising that accusations of sexism are often hurled with great fervor at many marketing campaigns. Some of these are mild and easily brushed off – yes, gender specific products are pitched at the relevant sex, but they are necessarily discriminatory. Some are harder to defend – whether overtly sexualizing women in advertisements amounts to sexism is debatable. Others are impossible to defend, either because they blatantly proclaim one gender as inferior or because they reinforce established sexist gender stereotypes. Here are 10 really, really sexist ads.


1. DRUMMOND SWEATERS –- MEN ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN!


Not even Robert Shapiro could defend this marketing campaign from accusations of sexism. The blatant sexism is so over-the-top that it’s laughable, even more so given that it is completely unrelated to the product being advertised. The preposterous proposition –a preposterousition, if you will – that “indoors, women are useful – even pleasant, [but] On a mountain they are something of a drag”, somehow fails to instill the burning and immediate desire for a “belted – attention grabbing – quite magnificent” sweater.


2. MR. LEGGS – IT’S NICE TO HAVE A WOMAN AROUND THE HOUSE


Mr. Leggs seems to agree that there is some utility and pleasantness in a woman’s presence in the modern urban indoor environment. However, its implementation of this notion in this particular advertisement is confusing at best and downright disturbing at worst. Why is there a bizarre tiger-rug-woman splayed on the floor? The tagline informs us it’s because she is a “tiger lady”. Why is there a man firmly standing on her with his foot atop her head in some sort of victory pose? Oh, because once she saw his Mr. Leggs pants she let him “walk all over her”. Groan and close tab. This advertisement’s failed humor and implicit disrespect has resulted in it being a staple in most discussions of sexist marketing.


3. PITNEY-BOWES POSTAGE METER – IS IT ALWAYS ILLEGAL TO KILL A WOMAN?


Another commonly featured example of sexist marketing is this 1953 advertisement. It normally appears on the interwebz in its detail form (marketing jargon for an image without copy {marketing jargon for the text of an advertisement}), but the accompanying copy of the complete advertisement gives a useful insight into Mr. Jones’ rageface. It reads as follows:
For six months I bend the ears of the home office to get a postage meter. I win …Then the only good, fast, dependable, honest-to-Gregg stenographer I got, this redhead Morissey – balks at a postage meter! 
“I have no mechanical aptitude. Machines mix me up, kind of,” she says. As if we asked her to fly a P-80. I almost blow my top. 
This postage meter, I explain, is modern, more efficient, a time saver… No more adhesive stamps. No stamp box, and who’s got the key? No running out of stamps you need. No scrounging. No stamp sticking. Just set the lever for any kind of stamp you want, for any kind of mail, and the meter prints the stamp right on the envelope with a dated postmark – and it seals the flap at the same time. Faster than mailing by hand. Prints stamps on tape for parcel post. Even keeps its own records! 
And metered mail doesn’t have to be postmarked and canceled in the post office, gets going earlier. It is practically heaven’s gift to the working girl…and so on. But with the Morissey, no soap. 
I try diplomacy, “Miss Morissey, I want you personally to try it for two weeks. If you don’t like it then – back it goes to the factory! I depend on your judgment implicitly. Okay?”… She acts like an early Christian about to be lunch for a lion, but gives in.
So help me – two weeks later she has a big pink bow on the handle of the postage meter – like it was an orchid or something. I give it the gape. 
“Kinda cute, ain’t it,” says Miss Morissey. “But a very efficient machine, Mr. Jones. Now the mail is out early enough so I get to the girls’ room in time to hear all the dirt”…I wonder, is it always illegal to kill a woman?
This advertisement throws into stark relief one of the great gaping inconsistencies of the ‘50s era: the fascist illustrator has blatantly failed to include the big pink orchid-rendering bow on the postage meter’s handle.


4. LYSOL – WHY DOES SHE SPEND HER EVENINGS ALONE?


This is another ad campaign that uses feminine hygiene to sell its product. And again, it sows the seeds of self doubt by declaring, “she keeps her home immaculate, looks as pretty as she can and really loves her husband, BUT she neglects that one essential…personal feminine hygiene”. Again, the stereotype of women as housebound husband-pleasers is reinforced – not only is she responsible for the maintenance of the house, but for maintaining his sexual libidinousness too. But perhaps the most disturbing part of this ad is its suggested use for Lysol, nowadays used as a hospital disinfectant, as a douching agent.


5. THE STEAM WASHER – LOOK HERE WEARY WOMAN!


This advertising campaign from the 1890’s is ever more vintage than the purple/teal sweater clashtastrophes that your average hipster fawns over. Heralding the advent of the newest innovation in home laundering, this advertisement gives a useful illustration of the life of a woman in those times – note especially the illustration in the top right, with its depiction of a little perving Geronimo.




6. TIPALET CIGARETTES – BLOW IN HER FACE AND SHE’LL FOLLOW YOU ANYWHERE


This marketing campaign is so wantonly laden with innuendo that it was probably a spunky, tongue-in-cheek spoof of the advertising world. But satire, if misunderstood, becomes indiscernible from the subject it derides. Somewhat ironically, this particular ad is often accused of sexism. And yes, irrespective of the intention, this ad does have misogynistic overtones – in both the violence implicit in its literal construction (interference with the woman’s personal space by blowing smoke in her face) and the sexual domination inherent in the allusion (producing a chin omelet) so it is easy to see why it is thus accused.


7. VOLKSWAGEN – SOONER OR LATER, YOUR WIFE WILL DRIVE HOME ONE OF THE BEST REASONS FOR OWNING A VOLKSWAGEN


“Women are soft and gentle, but they hit things. If your wife hits something in a Volkswagen, it doesn’t hurt you very much.”, proclaims this marketing campaign, reinforcing the stereotype that women make for bad drivers. There are several other swipes in the ad, including: “…Which means your wife isn’t limited to fender smashing. She can jab the hood. Graze the door. Or bump off the bumper.” Volkswagen? More like Blokeswagen. And rather than providing a solution for the problem (poor driving), the ad’s remedy is, sneakily, to buy more Volkswagen parts.


8. CHASE AND SANDBORN COFFEE – IF YOUR HUSBAND EVER FINDS OUT


Soft and gentle women may hit things in Volkswagens, but why not hit them instead? This ad seems perfectly at ease encouraging corporal punishment for wives daring to take shortcuts with their husbands’ coffee supply. Perhaps this was normal at the time, but we still feel that this ad caused significant controversy at the time it was published – we can see her ankles!


9. G. WASHINGTON’S INSTANT COFFEE – NOW EVEN A MAN CAN MAKE COFFEE


Thus far this article has only considered sexism relating to women, mainly because this is predominant trend in advertising. However, let us consider some sexism directed at men. This campaign of G. Washington’s Instant Coffee provides a solution for the poor man whose wife still won’t store-test his coffee (although this is now because she has selfishly died after an enthusiastic and fatal beating). But it’s okay, dear widower: there is now a coffee that is easy enough for you, a simple man, to be able to make in just 5 seconds!


10. ROGER’S LINGERIE – EVERY MAN WANTS HIS WOMAN ON A PEDESTAL


Just as the conventional wisdom relating to the roles that women play is offensive, so too is the conventional wisdom underlying this promotion run by Roger’s Lingerie, the eponymous fashion label of silver-screen sexpot Ginger Rogers.

In this ad, the rather dapper man is unable to appreciate his love for her, and can only play the role of a bank in a warped romantic ideal. He simpers at us gloweringly in his stiff formalwear, uncomfortable with his body and his forced position dictated by society whilst his love swans above happily, carefree in her light diaphanous silk, exulting in her sexuality. Or perhaps this is a representation of a stripshow – where a woman is just an object, naked under the critical and lecherous eye of the fully dressed male – and is actually more demeaning to her. This raises an important point with which to conclude: sexism can always be found if one wants to find it. Sexism is just as dehumanizing to the gender being demeaned as it is to the gender being glorified. As human beings, we should not let sexist intolerance or any intolerance rile and divide us: we dignify such ignorance if we allow it to offend us.

(This original article was written by Jonathan Bentz and published on SearchParq)




FOLLOW US
FacebookTumblrPinterestInstagramFlipboardRSS

Browse by Decades

Popular Posts