Bring back some good or bad memories


ADVERTISEMENT

November 15, 2026

Outtakes From Anni-Frid Lyngstad’s ”Frida ensam” Album Cover Photoshoot, 1975

Frida ensam (Frida Alone) is the second studio album by Anni-Frid Lyngstad. It was first released by Polar Music in 1975 while Lyngstad was a member of the pop group ABBA and produced by her then-fiancé and fellow ABBA member, Benny Andersson. The cover photoshoot for the album was shot by Ola Lager and designed by Rune Söderqvist, the two primary visual architects behind ABBA’s most iconic album sleeves.

Polar Music enlisted ABBA’s trusted in-house creative duo for the project: photographer Ola Lager and art director Rune Söderqvist (who later created ABBA’s famous Arrival helicopter cover). Unlike the bright, theatrical, and synchronized group imagery ABBA was known for in 1975, the Frida ensam shoot was designed to highlight solitude and vulnerability. The title translates to “Frida Alone,” reflecting both her status as a solo artist stepping away from the group and the introspective nature of the album’s ballads.

Photographed in an intimate interior setting in Stockholm, Frida is dressed in a soft, flowing white dress while seated on a couch and bed. Lager used soft, natural-looking lighting and warm, muted tones to frame Frida in quiet contemplation. Outtakes from the 1975 session, including several striking black-and-white portraits, show her posing casually without the heavy stage makeup or flamboyant costumes required for ABBA’s international television appearances.

The photoshoot and final album assembly took place during a brief lull in ABBA’s skyrocketing global schedule. Recording had stretched over 18 months (from early 1974 to October 1975) around sessions for Waterloo and ABBA.

Released by Polar Music on November 10, 1975, the album allowed Frida to explore eclectic covers (such as David Bowie’s “Life on Mars?” and Stephen Sondheim’s “Send in the Clowns”) alongside the original Swedish recording of “Fernando.” The understated, mature album cover reinforced her image in Sweden as a serious, independent vocalist rather than just one-fourth of a pop group.






40 Photos of Veronica Lake on the Set of “Sullivan’s Travels” (1941)

Despite their effortless, screwball chemistry on screen, Veronica Lake’s time on the set of Sullivan’s Travels (1941) was marked by major behind-the-scenes tension, largely stemming from a secret she kept until the first day of shooting. When production began on May 12, 1941, the 18-year-old Lake was six months pregnant with her first child, a fact she had withheld from writer-director Preston Sturges and Paramount Pictures.

Sturges was furious when he realized her condition on the first day of filming, reportedly needing to be calmed down by crew members. Legendary costume designer Edith Head was tasked with concealing Lake’s growing bump throughout the 10-week shoot. Because the plot required Lake’s character (“The Girl”) to disguise herself as a boyish hobo alongside Joel McCrea, Head used oversized men’s suits, baggy coats, and strategic framing, along with a body double for physical stunts, to hide the pregnancy. Filming wrapped on July 22, 1941, and Lake gave birth to her daughter, Elaine, just one month later.

While Lake later wrote in her autobiography that Sullivan’s Travels was “a joy to make” and praised the comedic change of pace, her co-star Joel McCrea strongly disliked working with her. Lake was notoriously moody and difficult on set, a reputation that followed her throughout the 1940s. McCrea found her behavior so frustrating that he initially turned down the male lead in their next scheduled pairing, I Married a Witch (1942), famously quipping, “Life’s too short for two films with Veronica Lake.” (The two eventually buried the hatchet years later to co-star in the 1947 Western Ramrod.)

Sullivan’s Travels was only Lake’s second major studio role following her breakout earlier that year in I Wanted Wings. The film solidified her signature “peek-a-boo” hairstyle, where a long wave of blonde hair fell over her right eye, as a national phenomenon. Even when tucked under a cap for her tramp disguise, the hairstyle remained a focal point of Paramount’s publicity campaign, turning Lake into one of Hollywood’s biggest box-office draws almost overnight.






1953 Nash-Healey Roadster: An Anglo-American Sports Car With Italian Flair

The 1953 Nash-Healey Roadster was a rare and distinctive sports car born from an unusual collaboration between American manufacturer Nash Motors and British sports car specialist Donald Healey. Its elegant bodywork was designed by Italian coachbuilder Pinin Farina, giving the car a refined European presence.

Powered by a 4.1-litre Nash inline-six engine producing around 140 horsepower, the Roadster combined American mechanical reliability with British chassis engineering and Italian styling. Only a limited number were produced, making surviving examples highly collectible today. With its unique blend of international influences, the Nash-Healey remains one of the most interesting and stylish sports cars of the early 1950s.

These beautiful photos capture the elegant lines and distinctive character of the 1953 Nash-Healey Roadster, an Anglo-American sports car with unmistakable Italian flair.






November 14, 2026

Moviegoers in 1973 Being Interviewed After Watching the Exorcist for the First Time

Moviegoers in 1973 being interviewed after watching The Exorcist for the first time. Directed by William Friedkin, the film became an unprecedented cultural phenomenon, causing massive lines around the block and documented physical hysteria among viewers.


When the film first rolled out in late December 1973, it shocked audiences like no horror movie before it. The graphic imagery, intense audio design, and disturbing themes caused moviegoers to shudder, cry, vomit, and faint right in the theaters.

The physical distress was so frequent that theater managers had to actively prepare for medical incidents. Staff were routinely equipped with sick bags and smelling salts (in both small bottles and breakable pellets) to revive fainted patrons in the lobby. As a theater manager notes in the archival broadcast, it was historically very rare for a film to trigger such visceral, unconscious physical reactions.

In the clip, the individuals explain exactly what pushed them over the edge. One viewer details passing out during the gruesome, clinical spinal tap scene. Another fainted the moment the young girl (played by Linda Blair) shifted her voice and began speaking in the “devil’s voice.”

The hysteria was so intense that one audience member who fainted and broke his jaw inside a theater actually sued Warner Bros., claiming that the film's intense subliminal imagery caused the incident. The lawsuit was ultimately settled out of court.

Despite the disgust, many fainted audience members interviewed in the footage admitted that their curiosity was killing them, stating that they intended to go right back into the theater to try and finish the movie.

30 Incredible Vintage Photos of the Belfast Blitz in 1941

These incredible vintage photos document the devastating air raids on Belfast, Northern Ireland during the spring of 1941, known as the Belfast Blitz. Over a series of attacks in April and May, German bombers targeted the city’s shipyards, factories, and residential areas, causing widespread destruction and significant loss of life.

The images capture the aftermath of the bombings: ruined streets, damaged buildings, fire-scarred neighborhoods, and the efforts of emergency services and civilians. They offer a powerful and sobering visual record of one of the most destructive periods in Belfast’s history during the Second World War.

"Land of Hope and Glory" York Road, Belfast, April 16, 1941

A.F.S. in York Street, Belfast, April 17, 1941

Aftermath of the Belfast Blitz, Spring 1941

Antrim Road corner of Duncairn Gardens, Belfast, April 19, 1941

Belfast Blitz, 1941

40 Stunning Portraits of Louise Brooks Taken by Eugene Robert Richee During the Mid to Late 1920s

Louise Brooks (1906–1985), the iconic silent-film actress and dancer known for popularizing the sharp bob haircut, was extensively photographed by Paramount’s chief portrait photographer Eugene Robert Richee (1896–1972) during the mid-to-late 1920s. These sessions produced some of the most enduring images of the Jazz Age and Roaring Twenties, especially a celebrated 1928 series in which Brooks appears in a black dress against a black background, holding a long strand of pearls.

Born Mary Louise Brooks on November 14, 1906, in Cherryvale, Kansas, she left home at 15 to study modern dance with Ruth St. Denis and Ted Shawn’s Denishawn company. She later danced in George White’s Scandals and the Ziegfeld Follies, which brought her to the attention of Paramount producer Walter Wanger. She signed a five-year contract with the studio in 1925 and began appearing in films, first in supporting roles and then as a lead in light comedies and flapper pictures.

By the late 1920s she had appeared in roughly a dozen films, including The American Venus (1926), It’s the Old Army Game (1926), A Girl in Every Port (1928), and Beggars of Life (1928). Her distinctive look with sleek black bob, pale skin, and intense dark eyes made her a natural for glamorous publicity stills and a symbol of the modern, independent “flapper.” She was also known for her intelligence, independence, and sometimes difficult relationship with the Hollywood studio system. In 1929 she left Paramount and went to Europe, where she starred for G.W. Pabst in Pandora’s Box and Diary of a Lost Girl, roles that cemented her lasting legend even as her American career faded.

Richee was born August 21, 1896, in Denver, Colorado. He entered Paramount’s photography department in the early 1920s, initially assisting Donald Biddle Keyes, and later headed the studio’s portrait gallery for roughly two decades. He photographed many of Paramount’s major stars of the era using large-format 8×10 cameras. His style emphasized careful lighting, soft diffusion in some work, and strong graphic composition; he sometimes used reflective props for added glamour. He later worked at Warner Bros. and elsewhere and died in 1972. Biographical details about him remain relatively sparse compared with better-known Hollywood portraitists such as George Hurrell.

Richee photographed Brooks repeatedly from about 1925 to the early 1930s (with the densest work during her Paramount years). Studio portrait sessions were standard publicity practice: stars posed in costumes, fashion, or idealized glamour setups that were then distributed to magazines, newspapers, and theaters. Brooks was considered one of the era’s most photogenic subjects, and Richee’s images of her are widely regarded as among his finest and the definitive visual record of her 1920s screen persona.

The most famous session is the 1928 “pearls” series. In the best-known frame, Brooks stands in profile in a long-sleeved black dress against a seamless black background; only her face, hands, and the long string of pearls are illuminated. The high-contrast, minimalist composition isolates her sharp bob (which curves across her cheek) and the elegant curve of the necklace. Retouching of the negative enhanced the pure black surround. Contemporary commentators note that the image perfectly captures the graphic, modern spirit of 1920s fashion and design; the bob itself became one of the century’s most influential hairstyles.

Richee also made more conventional portraits and fashion stills of Brooks, often in elegant interiors or against painted backdrops. Brooks later recalled their working relationship with characteristic brevity: “Eugene Richee used to take 60 shots in two hours. We never said a word to each other. Perfect relationship.”

These photographs outlived the short commercial peak of Brooks’s Hollywood career. They helped fix her image in popular memory as the quintessential flapper and silent-screen siren, and they remain among the most reproduced and admired Hollywood portraits of the decade. Richee’s contribution is frequently singled out as especially successful in capturing her distinctive look and presence.






22 Photos of a Young Jean Seberg on the Set of “Breathless” (1960)

On the set of Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless (À bout de souffle, filmed in August–September 1959 and released in 1960), 20-year-old Jean Seberg worked in a chaotic, improvisational, and guerrilla-style environment that was the complete opposite of her previous Hollywood studio experiences. Coming off rigidly controlled productions with Otto Preminger (Saint Joan and Bonjour Tristesse), Seberg initially struggled with Godard’s unconventional methods before embracing the creative freedom.

Godard worked from a loose outline rather than a finished script. He frequently wrote dialogue on the spot, often jotting lines down at a nearby café minutes before rolling, and fed Seberg and co-star Jean-Paul Belmondo their lines right before or even during takes. At times, Seberg reportedly wondered if the movie would ever be coherent or even released.

Because the film had a tiny $90,000 budget and no credited costume designer, Seberg styled herself and largely wore her own clothes. Her minimalist choices, including the iconic New York Herald Tribune T-shirt, cropped pants, and striped Breton tops, combined with her signature pixie cut, inadvertently turned her into a lasting fashion icon.

Much of the movie was filmed on the streets of Paris without permits using natural light and handheld cameras. To capture tracking shots of Seberg and Belmondo walking down the Champs-Élysées without drawing crowds, cinematographer Raoul Coutard famously hid inside a rolling postal cart or was pushed in a wheelchair while Godard directed from the sidelines.

Upon its initial release in France, the film attracted over two million viewers. It has since been considered one of the best films ever made, repeatedly appearing in Sight & Sound magazine’s decennial polls of filmmakers and critics on the subject. In May 2010, a fully restored version of the film was released in the United States to coincide with the film’s 50th anniversary. American film critic of the time, Pauline Kael, called it the most important New Wave film to reach the United States.









FOLLOW US:
Facebook • Tumblr • Pinterest • Instagram

CONTACT US



Browse by Decades

Popular Posts

Advertisement

09 10